Modern United States works under a social structure that has been set up by a majority that statistically fits into the same category. What category? The older, white, Christian male.

Unfortunately, the majority of American society does not fit into this category. However, most laws and rulings still reflect the rule of a minority's majority.
Anyone can spend an eternity identifying and lobbying for the rights of all the sub-groups in this society. I, however, tend to work in only two areas: under-privileged and homosexual rights.

Recently, I put together a second volunteer night of serving dinner to a group of
LGBTQ youth all under the banner of one organization:
Lambert House. This was done on the behalf of
Rain City Soccer Club, the club in which Brandon and I both play for various soccer teams, and also happens to serve gay and lesbian soccer players. PS - if you want to buy a calendar, that even features Brandon, go to the website.

The night was a lot of fun, like our previous dinner was as well, however one conversation really caught my attention:
According to the youth at the center, another young guy has recently been quoted in a local newspaper's blog as wanting to start up a Queer Youth Space and is declaring that there is not an organization like this available in Seattle.
The conversation then went on to explain how the guy in the article used to go to Lambert House and that he is personally taking a dig at the current Executive Director. Now, I read the article myself (I'm the kind of person who likes to try to follow the motto: his side, his side, and the truth). The guy in the article doesn't mention Lambert House at all. Instead, he seems to be upset with the fact that there's no club, or place that's similar, for the under-drinking-age to go to. In fact, Lambert House is only brought up and discussed in the comments following the article (want to read it for yourself? Go
here).
Some of the opinions brought up by the posters bring up a variety of good points: vicarious living, predation, transparent funding, accurate services, influencing values, etc.
How does someone wanting to give back to the youth of his community do so without seeming like he's in it for an ulterior motive? Basically, he can't. People are going to believe what they regardless of what he does. His only, and most powerful defense, is to keep what he does open and viewable by anyone.
Additionally, in my opinion, the director of a youth center like this one (and really any center for youth anywhere) should have some sort of venue for suggestions from the youth it services. Whether or not this is already in place for the Lambert House is not known, at least by me.
There was a comment that I found to be really interesting. That was the one made by the poster "Catalina
Vel-
DuRay":
"The thing that has always bugged me about Lambert House (and similar projects) is the tendency on the part of mostly well-meaning volunteers to want to either live vicariously through the young people or - worse - to use these kids to get some sort of karmic "do-over"
And I worry that we tend to impose our own gender stereotypes upon these kids. What about the femmy straight boys who get taunted as a fag, the female athlete who likes boys, but is labeled as a dyke, the pretty cheerleader who is secretly a lesbian, or the jock who hides behind homophobia because he is scared of his sexuality? None of these centers seem to address that - unless things have changed in the years since I knew anything about these places.
Being a teenager is confusing enough without adults inflicting their particular set of values and expectations on you. Gay folks, in particular, should understand that."
What I found interesting in this statement is primarily the poster's points on how youth identify themselves. While it's true, in my experience, that the
LGBTQ community tends to have a far wider range of identities than the heterosexual community. These would be failings of both communities to properly serve their kids and not singularly the homosexual population's fault. However, I would argue that there are individuals out there who are willing and capable of breaching both areas of discussion with any youth of any self-identity. The difficulty, then, is finding out who is capable and getting those who need/want that help a way to contact them.
In the first part of Catalina's post, the poster also mentions that some of the older community will live vicariously through the youth or will use their service to them as good karma. I can only speak for myself in this regard, however, I am not setting up these dinners for some sort of karmic reward. I know what I've done and not done in my lifetime and I've accepted whatever happens after I'm gone. Additionally, my life kicks ass. Sure, I'm poor, or sure, sometimes I wish I looked different, but I have an amazing boyfriend, awesome friends, and a one-of-a-kind family. There's no reason for me at all to try to live through these kids. If I, or any of my volunteers say "I wish I had these opportunities growing up" please, do not take that to mean (and I'm not saying the poster was, only that it's a possible deduction) that they, or myself, are attempting to live the lives of these kids.
It's difficult for anyone to live these days and the most some of us can do is to help others in any way they can. For me, that amounts to volunteering. Hopefully, some of you will join me.

That may be a peace sign, but don't get it twisted, I'll still bust your face if you mess with me.